Monday, February 28, 2011

Huntik Season 2 Beginning

commits an offense who snatches the documents to the link causes the collapse.

This follows from the sentence no 4538 of 21.02.2011. The case in Palermo. After a discussion of an employee had pulled one of his colleagues to cut him a folder of documents, making him fall to the ground. This
denounced him and the magistrate sentenced him to inflicted injuries. Then the court is confirmed. Now the final sentence is taken to the Supreme Court. The appeal is unfounded because, contrary to what the applicant maintains, the Court has consistently resolutions grounds for appeal, providing a detailed scrutiny of the testimonies given by the texts, from statements which had appeared for a fact that between the perpetrator and the victim there was a scuffle that had arisen on the initiative of the first, that, by attempting to wrest the antagonist of hand a folder of documents, had caused the fall the ground.
The dynamics of the facts is inconsistent with the hypothesis of self-defense overshadowed by the accused. "

0 comments:

Post a Comment