Travel Insurance For Diabetics In Ireland

According to the charge is manslaughter, so the tobacco must be condemned. Pretium

In 2003 he killed a robber and wounded another. That March 17
fired seven shots.
According to the indictment, John Petrali acted with malice, if not for revenge, and not for legitimate defense.
It 's the argument that the deputy prosecutor Piero De Pretis yesterday brought before the Assize Court of Appeal first, chaired by Justice Mary Louise Damen, at the first hearing against the tobacco 77enne, already sentenced to one year and 8 months killing a robber ee wounded another during a robbery attempt at his tobacconist.
been two years to the sentence of First Instance of 12 February 2009.
The judges then decided that it was manslaughter and bodily harm and therefore the imposition of a sentence of one year and eight months, with probation, in addition to harbor illegal weapons charges today barred.
It has been nearly eight years since that May 17, 2003. John
Petralli, 69enne time, he was in his tobacco "cabin" in the homonymous square, with his wife and an employee when he found himself in front of Alfredo Merlino, 20, and Solaro, Andrea, now 26 years old.
gun in hand, the two robbers beat him, threatened his wife and then groped to escape with thousands of € nottino. At this point Petrali shot seven times. Merlin hitting the heart and lung Solaro. For the first there was nothing to do, and Solaro p ended up in hospital.
shot while, according to ballistic experts, were fleeing along the Port of Vercelli.
A murder and attempted murder, according to Deputy Public Prosecutor De Pretis, even with the granting of extenuating dell'attenuante of generic and provacative,
But certainly not self-defense.
The judge said they had been based on expert assessments of the investigating judge in accordance with the principle of "favor rei", the principle of law that always applies the rule more favorable to the defendant. According to the experts
the shot that killed Merlin was shot when they were turned to flee. "The robbers were shot in the back," said the deputy prosecutor, noting that if the reaction of a victim is replacing earlier intervention by the police, if postponed, will be the revenge.
For there to be a legitimate defense "must be in a position of not being able to act otherwise to defend the right threat. "